This volume places the Russo-Georgian conflict in the context of Russia’s broader objectives, the country’s internal weaknesses, the limitations of EU and NATO policies, and America’s security priorities 다운로드. It also offers recommendations on how the transatlantic alliance can more effectively handle Russian ambitions and prepare itself to deter or manage future crises 다운로드.
Bugajski, J. (2010). Georgian Lessons: Conflicting Russian and Western Interests in the Wider Europe. CSIS.
The 2008 war in Georgia is but a milestone on the downward curve in NATO-Russia relations, one that has been characterized by misunderstandings, misplaced expectations and missed opportunities Apple download. This is not a new Cold War, but there is an obvious need for new ideas rather than repackaged old ones. NATO has to be sensitive to genuine Russian security concerns, and the latter should appreciate that manipulation, intimidation and attempts at dividing the Alliance are not shortcuts to superpower restoration 아래한글 뷰어 2010 다운로드. There is ample room for cooperation if the right lessons are learned, the gap between rhetoric and reality is reduced, and policies are governed by patience and pragmatism 다운로드.
Braun, A. (2009). NATO and Russia: Post-Georgia Threat Perceptions. IFRI, Russie. Nei. Visions, 40.
The goal of the policy paper is to assess the present state of civil society development, summarize ongoing discussions on relevant issues and offer recommendations for the next steps to foster the development of civil society in Georgia 다운로드.
Nodia, G. (2005). Civil society development in Georgia: Achievements and challenges. Tbilisi, Caucasus Institute for Peace, Democracy and Development 레고레이서1.
This paper is based on the author’s personal experience as the leader of a democracy think tank in Georgia for about twenty years, but also on numerous interviews and discussions with colleagues in the civil society and political communities gns3 ios 이미지.
Nodia, G. (2013). The Role of Democracy Research Organizations in Georgia. National Endowment for Democracy, Democracy Think Tanks in Action, 31 유니버스 샌드박스 2 다운로드.
Security problems of Georgia and the Caucasus are frequently analysed in terms of conflict, geopolitics and pipeline diplomacy. This study, however, awards those aspects subsidiary roles and turn focus to national security actors, international structures and security cooperation 윈도우 10 msdn 다운로드. Hence, the objective of this study is to critically assess Georgia’s security as of the year 2003, by seeking to answer three separate questions, namely: 1 일본 카카오톡 다운로드. What is the current status of Georgian’s national security structures? 2. What are the current options and implications for Georgia concerning international security structures? 3 낚시신공. What long-term issues and risks are connected to the US-Georgian security cooperation?
Larsson, R. (2003). Georgia’s Search for Security: An Analysis of Georgia’s National Security Structures and International Cooperation 다운로드. Occasional Paper No.1, Georgian Foundation for Security and International Studies, Tbilisi.