Models of economic and social developments, scenarios for domestic politics, the role of EU engagement and the possible Europeanization of national policies as well as outlooks for cooperation in the energy sector – articles of the collection cover not all but the most relevant topics in the South Caucasus of today and years to come 다운로드.
The South Caucasus 2018: Facts, Trends, Future Scenarios (2013). Tbilisi, Konrad-Adenauer-Stiftung (KAS).
골목길Security problems of Georgia and the Caucasus are frequently analysed in terms of conflict, geopolitics and pipeline diplomacy. This study, however, awards those aspects subsidiary roles and turn focus to national security actors, international structures and security cooperation 윈도우 10 msdn 다운로드. Hence, the objective of this study is to critically assess Georgia’s security as of the year 2003, by seeking to answer three separate questions, namely: 1 일본 카카오톡 다운로드. What is the current status of Georgian’s national security structures? 2. What are the current options and implications for Georgia concerning international security structures? 3 낚시신공. What long-term issues and risks are connected to the US-Georgian security cooperation?
Larsson, R. (2003). Georgia’s Search for Security: An Analysis of Georgia’s National Security Structures and International Cooperation 다운로드. Occasional Paper No.1, Georgian Foundation for Security and International Studies, Tbilisi.
Saakashvili and his government had a strongly articulated pro-Western foreign policy discourse directed at Georgia’s integration into the EU and NATO 다운로드. However, the actions of the government often did not follow the EU guidelines. This inconsistency was particularly vivid in Georgia’s ultra-liberal economic policies and poor level of democratic change 다운로드. The Georgian Dream government introduced a new dimension in the country’s foreign policy agenda: normalization of relations with Russia. While the opposition fears that the Russian dimension will endanger EU-Georgia cooperation, the pragmatic foreign policy approach of the current government leaves much hope for the closer political association and deeper economic integration of Georgia with the EU 음성 녹음 다운로드.
Merabishvili, G. (2013). Georgia’s Foreign Policy Priority: Relations with the European Union before and after the Change of the Government. EU Frontiers, No 다운로드. 10, Center for EU Enlargement Studies.
This paper explains why democratization has obtained a central role in Georgia’s foreign policy since 2003. The paper’s main argument is that Georgia’s pursuit of integration with the Euro-Atlantic security community and building a strong relationship with the U.S 다운로드. required a strong emphasis on Georgia’s international image as a democratic reformer. The paper also argues that the outcome of Georgia’s parliamentary elections in October 2012 should be understood in this perspective 피싱마스터 다운로드. The fact that the elections were free and fair enough to allow for the opposition’s victory is attributable to the ruling party’s perceived need to maintain Georgia’s international image as a democratic reformer 다운로드.
Nilsson, N. (2013). The October 2012 Elections and the Role of Democracy in Georgia’s Foreign Policy. Swedish Institute of International Affairs, Occasional Papers No 다운로드. 15
Georgia is entering a period of transition, with parliamentary and presidential elections due in 2012‒2013, after which a new constitution will take effect 교통표지판. The current government has made good progress in building a functioning state that delivers services to citizens, but Georgia’s economic picture is increasingly uncertain 다운로드.
After years of governing in an informal and improvisational way, the Georgian government needs to build institutions and choose a long-term development model 다운로드. Three ideas pull Georgia in different directions. The European Union (EU) offers … Georgia the best hope of long-term development and a European anchor 윈집 무료 다운로드.
De Waal, T. (2011). Georgia’s Choices: Charting a Future in Uncertain Times. Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.