“The Rose Revolution represented a victory not only for the Georgian people but for democracy globally. [It] . . . demonstrated that, by aggressively contesting elections, exercising basic freedoms of speech and assembly, and applying smart strategic thinking, a democratic opposition can defeat a weak semi-democratic kleptocracy.”
Mitchell, L 투캅스 다운로드. A. (2004). Georgia’s Rose revolution. Current History, 103 (675), 342-348.
윈도우즈 미디어 플레이어 다운로드In this investigation of the sources of the Rose Revolution in Georgia in November 2003 and presentation of the challenges the new leadership faces, the author argues that there are four contexts to the Georgian revolutionary events of 2003: first, a popular and romantic yearning among Georgians for union with Europe; second, the dismal failings of the Shevardnadze regime; third, the combined impact of global economic models and Westernisation in Georgia; and, fourth, the Soviet legacy 킹 오브 파이터즈 2002 다운로드. The role of civil society organisations, though important, was not vital to the success of the Rose Revolution.
Jones, S. F. (2006). The Rose revolution: A Revolution without revolutionaries? Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 19, (1) 다운로드.
Georgia’s August War with Russia prompted a new wave of political mobilization against the government of President Mikheil Saakashvili after a previous effort faltered in 2007–2008 폴라리스 오피스 2015 다운로드. Despite its renewed vigor, the postwar opposition failed for at least three reasons: 1) increased levels of political discontent did not translate to broad public support for the president’s resignation; 2) the opposition remained divided with regard to its methods and aims; and 3) the government successfully represented itself as an alternative engine of democratization 다운로드.
Welt, C. (2009). Still Staging Democracy: Contestation and Conciliation in Postwar Georgia. Demokratizatsiya: The Journal of Post-Soviet Democratization, 17(3), 196-227 윤고딕 200 다운로드.
In this paper, author argues that, rather than promoting democracy, Western foreign policy and diplomatic strategies and aid interventions have actually served to reinforce what Levitsky and Way (2002, 2010) call ‘competitive authoritarianism’ and exacerbate political instability and conflict in the country 이미지 한번에 다운로드.
Lazarus, J. (2010, September). Neo-liberal State Building and Western ‘Democracy Promotion’: The Case of Georgia. In SGIR 7th Pan-European Conference, Stockholm, Sweden 다운로드.
Why did the November-2007 events come as a complete surprise to the West? To answer the question it would be useful to analyze once again all those key tendencies and developments that took place in Georgia after the Rose Revolution 샤오미 와이파이 다운로드.
Papava, V. (2009). Anatomical Pathology of Georgia’s Rose Revolution. Current Politics and Economics of the Caucasus Region, 2(1), 1-18 다운로드.