The paper first discusses the extent to which the vulnerability of the regime was exposed before and during the electoral process 나를잊지말아요. Author then examines the factors that contributed to popular mobilization, noting at first why mobilization was surprising even given government vulnerability 다운로드. Third, he assesses the role of U.S. intervention and Serbian-inspired NGOs and offer tentative conclusions regarding their effects. The appendix addresses the question of why alternative electoral breakthroughs did not occur 다운로드.
Welt, C. (2006). Regime vulnerability and popular mobilization in Georgia’s Rose Revolution. Center on Democracy, Development, and the Rule of Law Working Papers, (67) 다운로드.
The purpose of this article is to provide an overview of Georgia’s party development and put it into the context of the country’s political life 다운로드. As the discussion of these issues in academic literature has been scarce, this paper is largely descriptive and does not intend to build the picture of party development into any frozen frame of the political theory 다운로드.
Devdariani, J. (2004). Georgia: Rise and fall of the façade democracy. Demokratizatsiya: The Journal of Post-Soviet Democratization, 12(1), 79-115 대부 게임 다운로드.
“The Rose Revolution represented a victory not only for the Georgian people but for democracy globally. [It] . . . demonstrated that, by aggressively contesting elections, exercising basic freedoms of speech and assembly, and applying smart strategic thinking, a democratic opposition can defeat a weak semi-democratic kleptocracy.”
Mitchell, L 투캅스 다운로드. A. (2004). Georgia’s Rose revolution. Current History, 103 (675), 342-348.