The present chapter is devoted to the use of history – in particular, the methods of ethnogenesis – and other scientific disciplines as mobilizing tools in the conflict between the Georgian and Abkhazian communities. This chapter describes the kind of arguments and scientific disciplines to be found in the Georgian-Abkhazian conflict over the political status of Abkhazia, and the way in which scholars in both national communities have reflected on questions such as the moral responsibility of the intelligentsia in the mass mobilizations leading to the war, and criteria for truthfulness in scientific debates 유튜브 다중 다운로드.
Coppieters, B. (2002). In Defence of the Homeland: Intellectuals and the Georgian-Abkhazian Conflict. In B. Coppieters, & M. Huysseune (Eds.), Secession, History and the Social Sciences ms 오피스. (pp. 89-116). Brussels: VUBPRESS.
In this paper, author is primarily interested in exploring the rhetorical opposition between form and content in Lelt Ghunia’s speech, whose correct realistic representation Chavchavadze presents, in his coda, as being the only project of the text 다운로드. Author argues that Chavchavadze uses this opposition both to naturalize his own relationship to the peasant Lelt Ghunia as a member of the “intelligentsia” to the “people”, creating an organic unity of language, a nation 다운로드.
Manning, H. P. (2004). Describing Dialect and Defining Civilization in an Early Georgian Nationalist Manifesto: Ilia Ch ‘avch’avadze’s “Letters of a Traveler” 다운로드.The Russian Review, 63(1), 26-47.
It is the contention of this paper that the party’s policy of “benign neglect” has not resulted in the desired goal of greater assimilation, at least not in Georgia, and that evidence points to a greater consolidation and cohesion of the Georgian nationality in recent years than had bean seen in the past 영문 cv 양식 다운로드.
Suny, R. G. (1979). Soviet Georgia in the Seventies. Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars; Kennan Institute Occasional Paper Series #64 2audio download.
The purpose of this article is to provide an overview of Georgia’s party development and put it into the context of the country’s political life 다운로드. As the discussion of these issues in academic literature has been scarce, this paper is largely descriptive and does not intend to build the picture of party development into any frozen frame of the political theory 다운로드.
Devdariani, J. (2004). Georgia: Rise and fall of the façade democracy. Demokratizatsiya: The Journal of Post-Soviet Democratization, 12(1), 79-115 대부 게임 다운로드.
Zaza Shatirishvili takes stock of the differences and similarities between two generations of Georgian intellectuals: Old nomenclatura versus the new scholars who dominate the growing non-governmental sector 도화의 저택 다운로드.
Shatirishvili, Z. (2003, 06 26). “Old” Intelligentsia and “New” Intellectuals: The Georgian Experience. Eurozine 다운로드.