This article examines the evolution of American policy in the Southern Caucasus since 1991. The article argues that US policy in the region has been ad hoc and inconsistent, reflecting ideological considerations (democracy promotion in Georgia), economic interests (access to Caspian Basin energy product and the development of US relations with Azerbaijan), US minority lobbying (US policy towards the Karabagh conflict), and idiosyncratic leadership preference (the personal relationship between Presidents Bush and Saakashvili) 동백꽃 필 무렵 11회 다운로드. This amalgam reflected the weakness of strategic drivers and notably Russia’s inability to act on its hegemonic aspirations in the region.
Khelashvili, G., & Macfarlane, S 다운로드. N. (2010). The Evolution of US Policy towards the Southern Caucasus. International Relations/Uluslararasi Iliskiler, 7(26).
This article reflects on the disparity of perceptions in the West over Georgia’s political trajectory since its first-ever peaceful transfer of power in October 2013 다운로드. Going beyond current affairs, the authors examine the significance of Georgia, primarily to Washington, in the context of greater developments in the diplomatic landscape 레바의모험 파이널. They argue that while the post-Soviet space has become increasingly multipolar and less convincingly multilateral, there is a need to go beyond a “reset” between former foes and a “reload” of the structure of regional alliances 온디맨드 코리아 다운로드.
Japaridze, T., & Roubanis, I. (2013). Tbilisi’s Relevance to Washington: What Is, Where Is, and What Can Be. American Foreign Policy Interests, 35(5), 272-282 다운로드.
It contains policy papers and recommendations covering some of the most pressing and sensitive issues of the current Georgian-Russian relations prepared by both Georgian and Russian authors 다운로드. Among the issues addressed in this publication are how European security environment affects Russo-Georgian relations, what are the possibilities for developing economic relations between the two neighbors and humanitarian aspects of Abkhazian and South Ossetian conflicts 유튜브 url 다운로드.
Gogolashvili, K. (2011). Russia and Georgia: Searching the Way Out. Georgian Foundation for Strategic and International Studies (GFSIS), Policy Discussion Papers by Georgian and Russian experts 다운로드.
The conventional explanation for the Caucasian conflicts stresses the combination of local ancient hatreds and Moscow’s secret meddling. In this article, Georgi Derluguian argues that this explanation is both incorrect and an impediment to finding a durable, peaceful solution and provides an attempt to revisit these arguments and existing contradictory narratives from the opponents in the Abkhazia conflict 가인이어라.
Derluguian, G. (2000). The forgotten Abkhazia: anatomy of post-socialist ethnic war. PONARS Policy Memo, 163.
In this article, Svante Cornell argues that while the humanitarian consequences of the 2008 Russo-Georgian war do not compare with what transpired in Chechnya or Bosnia in the 1990s, the conflict arguably marked the most significant challenge to Europe’s security architecture since the end of the cold war 다운로드. The author, then, explains some of the most important questions that have arised from this war: Why did this small war in the Caucasus happen, and who started it 다운로드? What implications will it have for the South Caucasus, for the former Soviet Union more broadly, and for Europe as a whole?
Cornell, S. E. (2008) 다운로드. War in Georgia, jitters all around. Current History,107(711), 307.